ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
DynaBiome: interpretable unsupervised learning of gut microbiome dysbiosis via temporal deep models.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGut microbiome dysbiosis is a critical determinant for autologous fecal microbiota transplantation (Auto-FMT) eligibility, yet current classification approaches rely predominantly on supervised learning with manually annotated sequencing labels, which are often scarce. This study proposes DynaBiome, a framework designed to predict gut dysbiosis by leveraging unsupervised learning and clinical phenotypic proxies as a scalable alternative to ground-truth genomic labeling.
methodsOur framework employs an LSTM autoencoder architecture to capture temporal microbiome dynamics within 14-day windows. The model reconstructs normal microbiome patterns, where high reconstruction errors signal potential dysbiosis. To ensure rigorous evaluation and prevent data leakage, the dataset was partitioned via a strict patient-level split. Unsupervised anomaly signals were refined via phenotypic proxy labels (e.g., fever, neutropenia) via weak supervision, and ensemble learning methods were applied to optimize classification performance.
resultsThe initial LSTM autoencoder successfully flagged dysbiotic sequences but required refinement to reduce false positives. Ensemble learning significantly enhanced predictive accuracy. The stacked ensemble (with Logistic Regression meta-learner) demonstrated optimal performance with an ROC AUC of 0.8908 and a Weighted F1-score of 0.7909. This approach significantly outperformed the standard One-Class SVM baseline (ROC AUC 0.6033), confirming the superiority of deep temporal modeling over static anomaly detection. Critically, the model achieved performance levels comparable to fully supervised baselines, confirming the efficacy of the proxy-label framework.
conclusionIntegrating unsupervised temporal feature extraction with stacked ensemble methods provides a viable framework for dysbiosis prediction. These results demonstrate that leveraging phenotypic via weak supervision can effectively approximate supervised baselines, thereby reducing the reliance on comprehensive metagenomic annotations for longitudinal patient monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.