Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41761084›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026

The impact of catheter replacement in patients with catheter-associated urinary tract infection: study protocol paper for a multicentre, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial (REPLACE).

Eline Schippers, Janneke van Uhm, Merel Wilmsen, Anke Tigchelaar, Wouter Rozemeijer, Barbara Schout, Elske van den Akker-van Marle, Martha van der Beek, Maxime Kummeling, Rolf Groenwold and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06936631 (REPLACE), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06936631 narecruitingnot on this map

REPLACE: the Impact of Catheter Replacement in Patients With Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeiden University Medical CenterRan2025 to 2029Enrolled300ConditionsCatheter Associated Urinary Tract InfectionArmsCatheter replacement, Catheter retainment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Eline SchippersLeiden University Center of Infectious Diseases (LUCID), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. e.c.schippers@lumc.nl.
Janneke van UhmDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Merel WilmsenLeiden University Center of Infectious Diseases (LUCID), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anke TigchelaarSpinal Cord Injury Association, Nijkerk, The Netherlands.
Wouter RozemeijerDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Barbara SchoutDepartment of Urology, Alrijne Ziekenhuis, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
Elske van den Akker-van MarleDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Martha van der BeekLeiden University Center of Infectious Diseases (LUCID), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maxime KummelingDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rolf GroenwoldDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Suzanne GeerlingsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Merel LambregtsLeiden University Center of Infectious Diseases (LUCID), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
REPLACE study group

Funding

ZonMw 10330042310046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCatheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is the most common healthcare associated infection. Current guidelines state that catheters should be replaced in patients with CAUTI to hasten symptom resolution and to lower the risk of recurrence. However, the available literature is limited and there is significant practice variation globally. The aim of this study is to determine whether not changing the catheter during CAUTI treatment affects the recurrence-risk. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The REPLACE study is a multicentre, non-inferiority- randomized controlled trial designed to assess whether retaining the urinary catheter in patients with CAUTI is non-inferior to replacement in terms of the risk of a recurrent CAUTI within 90 days. Secondary outcome measures include 30-day mortality, health-related quality of life, time to resolution of CAUTI symptoms, complications related to catheter replacement and healthcare and societal costs. Patients aged 18 years or older with an indwelling catheter (transurethral or suprapubic) and CAUTI are eligible. CAUTI is defined according to the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria. Three hundred patient will be randomised 1:1 to catheter retention (intervention group) or replacement (control group). In the intervention group, the catheter is not replaced. In the control group the catheter will be replaced within 3 days after start of antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome (recurrent CAUTI within 90 days) will be assessed for non-inferiority (margin of 10%). DISCUSSION: This trial will address a critical evidence gap and may inform future guidelines regarding catheter management in CAUTI. If replacement is found to have no benefit, this could reduce unnecessary interventions, lower healthcare costs and material use, contribute to sustainability, and lessen the burden on both patients and healthcare organizations.

trial registrationRegistered at clinicaltrial.gov on 17 April 2025 with registration number: NCT06936631.

Indexed as

Catheter-Related InfectionsUrinary CatheterizationUrinary Tract InfectionsCatheters, IndwellingEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUrinary CathetersCatheterCatheter associated urinary tract infectionCatheter related infectionUrinary tract infectionUrosepsis

Identifiers

PMID41761084
PMCPMC13049937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.