Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41761003›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2026

Exploring visual categorical learning in teleost fish Danio rerio and Xenotoca eiseni.

Valeria Anna Sovrano, Valentina Truppa, Davide Potrich, Remo Job, Simone Sulpizio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valeria Anna SovranoCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy. valeriaanna.sovrano@unitn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8962-2874
Valentina TruppaInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council (CNR), Rome, Italy. valentina.truppa@istc.cnr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7623-7547
Davide PotrichCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0928-628X
Remo JobDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2379-462X
Simone SulpizioDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. simone.sulpizio@unimib.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4051-9494

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Categorization skills enable animal species to sort entities based on their similarities, providing significant advantages in terms of learning efficiency. The extent of these skills and the mechanisms involved vary across taxa, making it critical to explore categorization in as many lineages as possible. From an evolutionary standpoint, fish are valuable models for studying categorization processes; however, until recently, this group of vertebrates has been neglected in visual categorization research. To address this gap, we conducted three experiments to investigate, for the first time, the visual categorical learning skills of the redtail splitfin (Xenotoca eiseni) and the zebrafish (Danio rerio), two teleost species studied in other contexts of animal cognition. Using a two-alternative forced-choice task, we first trained the fish to discriminate between several pairs of stimuli. Then, we tested their ability to generalize to pairs of new stimuli of the same categories. The stimulus categories varied across the experiments (Experiments 1 and 2: alphanumeric characters; Experiment 3: fish silhouettes) and were consistent with those used in past studies involving different taxa. Both fish species met the learning criterion in the training phase across all three experiments, but their ability to generalize to novel stimuli differed based on stimulus features. Moreover, both species presented interindividual differences in their ability to generalize what they learnt. Our results validate the use of X. eiseni and D. rerio as models for research on categorical learning. They also encourage further investigation into how experimental methods and stimuli could affect learning-based generalization abilities in these species.

Indexed as

CyprinodontiformesDiscrimination LearningLearningVisual PerceptionZebrafishAnimalsFemaleMalePattern Recognition, VisualCategorizationCognitionFishLearningStimuliVisual discrimination

Identifiers

PMID41761003
PMCPMC12956930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.