ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2026
Characterization of soft tissue-mimicking materials for ultrasound training phantoms.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of soft tissue-mimicking materials for ultrasound training phantoms.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient as a Biomarker of Hepatic Steatosis: State of the Art and Software Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue-mimicking materials are essential for developing realistic ultrasound phantoms in medical training and device calibration. This study systematically evaluates the acoustic and physical properties of 15 materials, including gelatin-based formulations, synthetic gels, and rubbers, to assess their suitability for simulating human soft tissues. The investigation focused on ultrasound propagation speed, attenuation coefficients, and temporal stability, with measurements conducted under controlled conditions to ensure consistency. Results revealed that organic gelatins exhibited propagation speeds (1508-1626 m/s) and attenuation coefficients (0.21-1.10 dB/cm) closely aligned with soft tissue benchmarks (1540 m/s and 0.54 dB/cm MHz, respectively), with minimal variations (<5%) over 15 days. However, their susceptibility to dehydration and mold growth necessitates protective measures. Synthetic gels, such as ballistic gel and PVC-Plastisol, demonstrated superior long-term stability but required more complex fabrication processes. Rubbers, while durable, exhibited acoustic properties that deviated significantly from tissue standards, limiting their utility. The study quantitatively highlights trade-offs between material categories: gelatins offer cost-effectiveness and acoustic fidelity for short-term use, whereas synthetic gels provide durability for repeated applications. These findings provide a comprehensive framework for selecting materials tailored to specific phantom requirements, balancing acoustic accuracy, stability, and manufacturability. The work advances the development of high-fidelity, cost-effective phantoms, with implications for improving ultrasound training and diagnostic tool validation. Future research should explore hybrid materials and extended stability assessments to further optimize phantom performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.