ArticleClinical neuroradiology2026
Effect of Stenosis Severity on Outcomes After Rescue Stenting for Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusions: a Real-world Multicenter Analysis.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRescue stenting (RS) can achieve durable recanalization in cases of acute large vessel occlusion due to underlying intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS), but its clinical effects may be influenced by procedural factors. This study aimed to evaluate whether the severity of stenosis affects the outcomes after RS.
methodsIn this multicenter retrospective study, patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusion and underlying ICAS were divided into two groups based on the treatment they received: mechanical thrombectomy (MT) + RS (n = 172) or MT-only (n = 131). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. We systematically evaluated stenosis thresholds from 40% to 90% to identify the optimal cutoff that best differentiated treatment effects on the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score and safety outcomes, including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).
resultsA stenosis severity of 75% was identified as the optimal cutoff for effect modification. While RS improved recanalization rates overall, its effect on the 90-day mRS score was beneficial only in patients with > 75% stenosis compared to MT-only (Average Treatment Effect (ATE) -0.98, 95% CI -1.73 to -0.22; p = 0.01). In contrast, it showed a detrimental effect in those with < 75% stenosis (ATE 1.08, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.83; p = 0.005). Furthermore, RS increased the rate of sICH regardless of ICAS severity.
conclusionsThe clinical benefit of RS is contingent on the underlying stenosis severity, providing favorable outcomes in patients with high-grade stenoses only. ICAS severity should also be considered for treatment decisions, though these findings require validation in prospective controlled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.