Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41760911›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

Advancing medical AI through benchmarking and competition for specialty triage.

Chao Ding, Mouxiao Bian, Minjia Yuan, Luyi Jiang, Kaiyi Luo, Pengcheng Chen, Yuanye Jiang, Jie Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chao Ding *Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China.
Mouxiao Bian *Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China.
Minjia Yuan *Joint Laboratory of Biomedical Artificial Intelligence, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Luyi JiangShanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Kaiyi LuoShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China.
Pengcheng ChenShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China.
Yuanye JiangPutuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China. yuanye1014@126.com.
Jie XuShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China. xujie@pjlab.org.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence holds transformative potential for clinical triage, yet challenges in accuracy, generalization, and interpretability persist. To address these gaps, we introduce MedTriage, a benchmark designed to evaluate large-scale models across diverse clinical scenarios rigorously. Leveraging this framework, we launched the Large-Model-Based Medical Triage Evaluation Competition, utilizing real-world clinician-patient dialogues from general hospitals and four specialized domains. The competition engaged numerous research teams, spurring advancements in large-model-driven triage algorithms. Building on the competition insights, we developed an enhanced model (MedGPT-Guide) employing a "10 Relevant + 10 Random + Ensemble" strategy, achieving superior accuracy on the MedTriage benchmark. Our results underscore the power of "evaluation-driven training" to improve model performance and lay the groundwork for standardized, deployable intelligent triage systems. Moving forward, priorities include enhancing data security, model generalization, and addressing legal and regulatory frameworks.

Identifiers

PMID41760911
PMCPMC13066094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.