ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Advancing medical AI through benchmarking and competition for specialty triage.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Governing Clinical Readiness Claims Derived from Medical AI Benchmark Results.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- The road from standardized to personalized medicine: the difficult-to-treat framework as a critical waystation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence holds transformative potential for clinical triage, yet challenges in accuracy, generalization, and interpretability persist. To address these gaps, we introduce MedTriage, a benchmark designed to evaluate large-scale models across diverse clinical scenarios rigorously. Leveraging this framework, we launched the Large-Model-Based Medical Triage Evaluation Competition, utilizing real-world clinician-patient dialogues from general hospitals and four specialized domains. The competition engaged numerous research teams, spurring advancements in large-model-driven triage algorithms. Building on the competition insights, we developed an enhanced model (MedGPT-Guide) employing a "10 Relevant + 10 Random + Ensemble" strategy, achieving superior accuracy on the MedTriage benchmark. Our results underscore the power of "evaluation-driven training" to improve model performance and lay the groundwork for standardized, deployable intelligent triage systems. Moving forward, priorities include enhancing data security, model generalization, and addressing legal and regulatory frameworks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.