ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2026
Increasing Retention in a Trial by Supporting Basic Psychological Needs for Autonomy, Competence and Relatedness: Developing a Theory-Informed App-Based Complex Intervention.
Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesMost interventions to improve retention in randomised trials have low or uncertain evidence of effect and are not informed by behaviour change science even though behaviour change is their aim. Self-Determination Theory is an evidence-based theory within behaviour change science which argues that supporting basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness leads to high-quality motivation, active engagement and well-being. The purpose of this study was to develop a need-supportive digital intervention supporting these three psychological needs to increase retention in a randomised allergy trial. METHODOLOGICAL
designWe applied the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions and merged the development phase with steps suggested by O'Cathain and colleagues. Development was an iterative process involving patient partners. It included: (1) Evidence review, (2) Identification of theory, (3) Interviews, (4) Workshops, (5) Prototyping, and (6) Programme theory.
resultsWe developed a web app intended to support participants' basic psychological needs informed by findings from stages one to six in this development process. It included the following features: (a) the option to only complete all questions on days with symptoms, (b) the possibility to answer up to 48 h later, (c) positive feedback when responding to a questionnaire, (d) pollen counts and forecasts, (e) personal and total response rate, (f) visualisation of data entered, (g) advice about grass pollen allergy, (h) updates on the status of the allergy trial, (i) an ability to change the time of the reminder, (j) download icon and (k) contact information.
conclusionsThis study provided findings on how to support basic psychological needs among participants with grass pollen allergy in a randomised trial through need-supportive technology. The web app was ready for a randomised feasibility test within the allergy trial during the grass pollen season of 2022.
trial registrationAllergy trial: EudraCT 2020-006020-28.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.