Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41760759›Full record

ReviewBritish dental journal2026

Beyond protection: the growing role of instrumented mouthguards in sports.

John Patrick Haughey, Gregory Tierney, Garreth Farrell, Ian Needleman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John Patrick HaugheyEastman Dental Institute, Department of CPD, University College London, London, United Kingdom. j.haughey@ucl.ac.uk.
Gregory TierneySchool of Sport, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Garreth FarrellLeinster Rugby, Dublin, Ireland.
Ian NeedlemanEastman Dental Institute, Periodontology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instrumented mouthguards (iMGs) are being used in sport to help with sport-related concussion management, performance optimisation and injury prevention. iMGs represent a significant advancement at the intersection of sports dentistry, biomechanics, and wearable technology. Evolving from traditional protective mouthguards, iMGs integrate sensors that can measure head acceleration events, providing real-time biomechanical data during training and competition. These devices have gained substantial attention due to their potential to support concussion protocols, monitor athlete performance, and aid in injury prevention. World Rugby's 2024 mandate requiring iMG use in elite-level competition marks a pivotal shift in sports safety standards, setting a precedent for broader adoption. iMGs offer several benefits, including accurate impact measurement, data-driven injury risk assessment, and support for return-to-play decisions. Despite their advantages, challenges such as cost, data interpretation, data accuracy, technology malfunction and wearer comfort remain. Design improvements, such as the miniaturisation and strategic placement of components, have addressed many early limitations. As sensor technology continues to evolve, iMGs are expected to integrate additional features and become more widely accessible, potentially extending their use to youth and amateur sports. This review explores the development, functionality, applications, and future potential of iMGs, highlighting their growing role in enhancing player safety and performance across high-impact sports.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesBrain ConcussionMouth ProtectorsBiomechanical PhenomenaEquipment DesignHumans

Identifiers

PMID41760759
PMCPMC12948673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.