Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41760756›Full record

ReviewBritish dental journal2026

What do we know about elite athlete oral health?

Ian Needleman, Julie Gallagher, Paul Ashley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ian NeedlemanCentre for Oral Health and Performance, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK. i.needleman@ucl.ac.uk.
Julie GallagherCentre for Oral Health and Performance, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.
Paul AshleyCentre for Oral Health and Performance, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims Multiple studies have identified that dental caries, periodontal diseases and erosive toothwear are common in elite athletes and possibly more prevalent than in non-athlete populations. The aims of this paper are to: 1) explore what we know about oral health in elite athletes and why we should consider athletes a priority for oral health interventions; 2) to consider the determinants of oral health and how to tackle the potential risks to athletes; and 3) to provide a summary for providers of oral health care and oral health policy, as well as athletes and sports medicine practitioners and allied professionals.Results Oral diseases are common in elite athletes with some conditions, especially dental caries, likely at higher levels than the general population. There is a network of determinants at individual athlete, team and societal/policy level. Implementation of change will require user involvement, behaviour change science and an understanding of the ecosystems of elite sport. Low-cost interventions with good evidence of benefit can be implemented especially harnessing specific motivators in elite sport.Conclusions The burden of oral disease in elite athletes can affect performance, health and wellbeing, and may confer a life-long shadow of treatment and disadvantage. Elite sport should be viewed as a priority for oral health improvement. Simple interventions can improve oral health in high performance sport but need to be underpinned by behaviour change science. Maintaining the oral health of athletes supports their high-level performance goals of athletes and addresses the duty of care. Furthermore, there might be the opportunity for significant oral health capital from the athletes as role models to the rest of the population.

Indexed as

AthletesOral HealthDental CariesHumansPeriodontal DiseasesSports

Identifiers

PMID41760756
PMCPMC12948666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.