ReviewCommunications biology2026
Generative models of cell dynamics: from Neural ODEs to flow matching.
Review in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cell dynamics on energy landscape: Comparing attractor detection in Boolean network and diffusion-based models under in silico gene perturbations.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (Neural ODEs) have emerged as a prominent framework for modeling complex dynamical systems. Their ability to describe a system's underlying dynamical law has attracted attention to applications in life sciences. Single-cell data presents challenges due to noise, sparsity, and the inability to explicitly profile single cells across time. However, pioneering works have demonstrated how Neural ODE-based models can overcome these hurdles, aid mechanistic modeling of cellular development, and approximate population dynamics through the lens of Flow Matching. This article studies why Neural ODEs are suited for modeling the dynamic processes in single-cell data and broader computational health fields, from standard time-series parameterizations to generative models based on optimal transport. We first explore the mathematical properties of Neural ODEs and their application to modeling cellular dynamics. Successively, we zoom into how recent innovations in generative modeling enable efficient and expressive cell state transition modeling through the simulation-free Flow Matching approach. Finally, we present challenges in modeling single-cell dynamics that drive ongoing research in single-cell biology. This work shows that Neural ODEs, as a machine learning framework, are appropriate for modeling dynamic processes in cellular data and promises to advance our understanding of the dynamics in cellular systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.