Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41760720›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2026

Generative models of cell dynamics: from Neural ODEs to flow matching.

Till Richter, Weixu Wang, Alessandro Palma, Fabian J Theis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Till RichterHelmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6008-8209
Weixu WangHelmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alessandro PalmaHelmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.
Fabian J TheisHelmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany. fabian.theis@helmholtz-munich.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-1943

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01IS18053ABundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 031L0289AEuropean Commission (EC) 101054957European Commission (EC) 101057775Helmholtz Association Interlabs-0029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (Neural ODEs) have emerged as a prominent framework for modeling complex dynamical systems. Their ability to describe a system's underlying dynamical law has attracted attention to applications in life sciences. Single-cell data presents challenges due to noise, sparsity, and the inability to explicitly profile single cells across time. However, pioneering works have demonstrated how Neural ODE-based models can overcome these hurdles, aid mechanistic modeling of cellular development, and approximate population dynamics through the lens of Flow Matching. This article studies why Neural ODEs are suited for modeling the dynamic processes in single-cell data and broader computational health fields, from standard time-series parameterizations to generative models based on optimal transport. We first explore the mathematical properties of Neural ODEs and their application to modeling cellular dynamics. Successively, we zoom into how recent innovations in generative modeling enable efficient and expressive cell state transition modeling through the simulation-free Flow Matching approach. Finally, we present challenges in modeling single-cell dynamics that drive ongoing research in single-cell biology. This work shows that Neural ODEs, as a machine learning framework, are appropriate for modeling dynamic processes in cellular data and promises to advance our understanding of the dynamics in cellular systems.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41760720
PMCPMC12976343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.