ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026
The landscape of the intestinal microbiome among patients with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The intestinal microbiome shapes immune responses and is associated with patient outcomes in cancer following immunotherapy. We evaluated differences between the intestinal microbiome profiles of patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer (BC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by subtype using whole genome metagenomic sequencing. There were no significant differences in microbiome composition between DCIS and invasive BC as measured by alpha diversity (p = 0.20, ANOVA) or beta diversity (p = 0.52, PERMANOVA). Within invasive BC, patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR + )/HER2 + BC differed significantly in beta diversity relative to other subtypes (p < 0.05), with differences in six species (q < 0.25). Bacteroides ovatus was significantly more abundant in patients with stage III BC vs. stage I (p = 0.0003). Functional pathway analysis using HUMAnN3 revealed stage-specific enrichment of amino acid biosynthesis and nucleotide-related pathways. Altogether, these findings highlight potential microbial signatures associated with BC subtype and stage.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.