Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41760672›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Intonation and timing in singing early music is unrelated to respiration synchronization.

Anton Schreiber, Klaus Frieler, Elke B Lange

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anton SchreiberMax-Planck-Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt, Germany. anton.schreiber@uni-hamburg.de.
Klaus FrielerMax-Planck-Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt, Germany.
Elke B LangeMax-Planck-Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musical ensemble performance offers a unique context for investigating complex interpersonal coordination. Hyperscanning research revealed the synchronization of physiological processes during coordinated musical interaction. In a previous study, we showed that physical touch enhanced respiratory coupling between professional singers performing together. We expand on this research by investigating whether this respiration coupling affects performance quality in terms of timing and intonation. Eight singers (two for each voice part) performed Renaissance works multiple times, both with and without physical touch. We annotated the recorded vocal tracks with precise onset times and pitch information, resulting in 64,214 tone events. We analyzed timing as mean onset deviation and intonation as mean absolute pitch deviation, both within voice groups. In contrast to the findings on respiration coupling, physical contact had no effect on timing and intonation, indicating that there is no relation between respiration coupling and singing quality. When tested directly with linear mixed effect models, respiration coupling did not predict intonation or timing in five of six models. One model showed a negative effect: higher respiration coupling decreased intonation accuracy. We conclude, in a professionally trained vocal ensemble, increased respiration coupling does not enhance singing quality.

Indexed as

Empirical aestheticsHyperscanningMusic performanceRespiration synchronizationSinging quality

Identifiers

PMID41760672
PMCPMC12953873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.