ArticleScientific reports2026
Large variations in total and allele-specific transcript expression in a disease mutation-independent manner.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals with monogenic diseases, even those with identical disease-causing mutations, exhibit considerable clinical heterogeneity in severity and outcomes. In this study, we quantified total and allele-specific transcript levels in nasal brushings from patients diagnosed with cystic fibrosis (CF) who are homozygous or compound heterozygous for variants in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. Among CF patients, total CFTR transcript levels showed greater variability than in non-CF individuals, although both groups exhibited a broad range of transcript expression. Compound heterozygous study subjects also displayed notable differences in allelic dosage, known as allelic skewing. The expression from the non-F508del allele predominated in the total transcript pool. For a small group of patients with nasal brushings available before and after treatment with FDA/EMA-approved drugs Trikafta/Kaftrio (a combination of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor) or Symkevi (a combination of tezacaftor-ivacaftor), we observed no effect on total CFTR transcript abundance but detected changes in allelic expression patterns. These findings reveal important aspects to be considered for personalized therapeutic approaches to CF and other monogenic diseases and emphasize previously unappreciated aspects of mRNA expression during pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.