ArticleNature communications2026
Reconstructing single-cell resolution from spatial transcriptomics with CellRefiner.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal spatial omics: From data acquisition to computational integration.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Reply to Wang et al.: Linking microbial metabolites and gut epithelial responses to microbiome-directed therapeutic foods.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Reconstructing single-cell resolution from spatial transcriptomics with CellRefiner.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing technologies profile the transcriptome of individual cells but lack the spatial context necessary for dissecting cellular interactions like cell-cell communications. On the other hand, most current spatial transcriptomic technologies lack cellular resolution, limiting their capability for realistic downstream analysis. Here we present CellRefiner, a physical model-based method that integrates a single-cell dataset with a paired spatial dataset to generate single-cell resolution in the imputed spatial data. CellRefiner models cells as particles connected by forces, and then optimizes cell locations with spatial proximity constraints, gene expression similarity, and ligand-receptor interactions between cells. We systematically benchmark CellRefiner over a variety of simulated and real datasets using Visium, MERFISH, seqFISH, Slide-seqV2, and STARmap datasets to demonstrate its accuracy, robustness, and ability to recover spatial patterns of cells. We also demonstrate its utility for improving spatially dependent analysis over the original spatial data for the contact-based cell-cell communication on mouse cortex and lymph node tissues. Our results show CellRefiner is capable of reconstructing single-cell resolution from non-single-cell resolution spatial data, allowing downstream analysis that requires individual-cell resolution and spatial information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.