Trial reportNature communications2026
First-line modified FOLFOX plus/minus nivolumab and Ipilimumab or FLOT plus nivolumab in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: a phase II multi-cohort trial.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03647969 (Modified FOLFOX Plus/Minus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab vs. FLOT Plus Nivolumab in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction - A Randomized Phase 2 Trial.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Modified FOLFOX Plus/Minus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab vs. FLOT Plus Nivolumab in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction - A Randomized Phase 2 Trial.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This multi-cohort study evaluates whether dual immune checkpoint inhibition with nivolumab and ipilimumab in parallel or sequentially, or triplet chemotherapy with nivolumab can enhance efficacy as first-line therapy for advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Patients are randomized 1:1 to Arm A (mFOLFOX + nivolumab 240 mg every two weeks + ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every six weeks in parallel or Arm B (mFOLFOX). Subsequently, patients are randomized 1:2 to Arm A1 (identical to Arm A) or Arm A2 (three cycles of mFOLFOX followed by nivolumab + ipilimumab). In Arm C all patients receive FLOT + nivolumab. Primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival and objective response rate. Median progression-free survival (months) is: Arm A/A1, 5.8; Arm A2, 4.0; Arm B, 6.6 and Arm C, 7.0.Toxicity is manageable across all arms, with higher rates in arms receiving dual checkpoint inhibition. Here we show that chemotherapy with dual checkpoint inhibition in parallel increases toxicity without improving efficacy, while FOLFOX followed by immunotherapy is insufficient. FLOT with nivolumab appears feasible and shows promising efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03647969.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.