ArticleNature communications2026
Fast response of satellite fluorescence-derived plant physiology to drought stress.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The differences in response times between vegetation physiology and vegetation structure to water stress at the global scale remain unclear. Here, we integrate solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence satellite observations, optical remote sensing indices, and hydrometeorological data to globally disentangle the sequence and related factors of vegetation physiological and structural responses to drought. We isolated fluorescence efficiency by normalizing solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence by absorbed photosynthetically active radiation; We show that fluorescence efficiency is a robust proxy for ecosystem-level vegetation physiology and responds to drought within ~3 days, while structural changes emerge after ~12 days. The contrast in timing is clearest in humid regions, owing to the sustained soil moisture availability during the initial stage of drought. Physiological responses are more temporally aligned with changes in vapor pressure deficit, whereas structural changes coincide more with soil moisture dynamics, reflecting differing patterns of association under increasing drought stress. These findings advance mechanistic understanding of vegetation drought responses across the continuum from physiological to structural processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.