Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41760568›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2026

Biologic dose escalation in inflammatory bowel disease in the United States.

Casey Chapman, Aisha Vadhariya, Nicholas Bires, Brenna L Brady, Thomas Creveling, Ryan Ross, Kristin A Evans, Tommaso Panni, Faye W Chan-Diehl, Kim McGinnis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Casey ChapmanGI Alliance, Baton Rouge, LA.
Aisha VadhariyaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
Nicholas BiresEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
Brenna L BradyMerative, Ann Arbor, MI.
Thomas CrevelingEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
Ryan RossMerative, Ann Arbor, MI.
Kristin A EvansMerative, Ann Arbor, MI.
Tommaso PanniEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
Faye W Chan-DiehlEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
Kim McGinnisEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), composed of Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), frequently employs biologics to help control inflammation, reduce symptom burden, and limit disease progression. Because of both the lifelong, progressive nature of disease and potential for loss of therapy response over time, therapy changes are common. Biologic dose escalation is one method to adjust therapy regimens following loss of response.

objectiveTo assess the occurrence of dose escalation in CD and UC and its influence on health care costs.

methodsAdults with a diagnosis of CD or UC newly initiating therapy with a biologic (adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib [UC only]) from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2022, were selected in the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Databases. The first claim for the biologic served as the index date and patients were followed over a 12-month pre-period and a 12-month-or-longer post-period. Dose escalation during the maintenance phase of therapy, discontinuation, and postdiscontinuation switching were assessed in biologic-based subgroups in each of the CD and UC cohorts; per-patient-per-month (PPPM) IBD-related health care costs over the duration of index biologic treatment were also calculated.

resultsAnalyses included 6,056 patients with CD (33.5% adalimumab, 30.6% ustekinumab, 18.8% infliximab, 17.1% vedolizumab) and 4,533 patients with UC (35.1% vedolizumab, 30.6% adalimumab, 16.8% infliximab, 10.0% ustekinumab, 7.5% tofacitinib). Dose escalation occurred in 30.4% of patients with CD (adalimumab 20.8%, infliximab 48.8%, ustekinumab 26.9%, vedolizumab 36.2%) and 30.1% of patients with UC (adalimumab 23.0%, infliximab 44.8%, ustekinumab 25.5%, vedolizumab 31.8%, tofacitinib 24.9%). Patients with evidence of dose escalation had lower rates of discontinuation compared with nonescalators over follow-up but were more likely to switch biologics after discontinuation. PPPM IBD-related health care costs over the course of treatment were substantial and largely driven by index biologic costs. Mean PPPM costs for the CD cohort ranged from $4,543 in the infliximab group to $14,031 in the ustekinumab group; costs were similar in the UC cohort, ranging from $5,213 in the infliximab group to $14,246 in the ustekinumab group. Within both cohorts, dose escalation was a significant predictor of increased IBD-related health care costs.

conclusionsNearly one-third of patients with IBD in this study escalated their biologic dose, which significantly increased their disease-related health care costs. These results demonstrate current challenges in long-term biologic therapy in IBD and highlight the ongoing need for further research into biologic management strategies to optimize IBD patient care and long-term outcomes, while containing costs.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseGastrointestinal AgentsInflammatory Bowel DiseasesAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesPyrimidinesUnited StatesBiological ProductsGastrointestinal AgentsPiperidinesPyrimidinestofacitinib

Identifiers

PMID41760568
PMCPMC12948753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.