Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41760378›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Estimating Risk Differences Using Large Healthcare Data Networks for Medical Product Post-Market Safety Outcomes in a Distributed Data Setting and Allowing for Active Post-Market Surveillance.

Andrea J Cook, Robert D Wellman, Tracey Marsh, Ram C Tiwari, Michael D Nguyen, Estelle Russek-Cohen, Yuexiang Peng, Jennifer C Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea J CookDivision of Biostatistics, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Robert D WellmanDivision of Biostatistics, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Tracey MarshBiostatistics Program, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6865-5092
Ram C TiwariGlobal Stat Solutions, LLC, Reston, Virginia, USA.
Michael D NguyenDivision of Diabetes, Lipid Disorders and Obesity, FDA, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Estelle Russek-CohenERC Stat LLC, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Yuexiang PengDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jennifer C NelsonDivision of Biostatistics, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

CDC HHS 75D30122D15428FDA HHS HHSF223200910006I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk differences allow decision makers to easily estimate the excess safety risk associated with a medical product relative to the potential benefits. However, in post-market observational surveillance studies that actively monitor (e.g., sequentially over time) for safety risk of new medical products, available methods target a relative measure (e.g., odds ratio and relative risk), which can be especially unstable in the rare event setting. These studies are typically conducted within distributed healthcare networks (e.g., Food and Drug Administration [FDA] Sentinel and Centers for Disease Control [CDC] Vaccine Safety Datalink) with patient-level data protected behind firewalls, but sharing of aggregate, deidentified data for centralized analyses. We propose an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method that uses site-specific propensity scores to estimate site-specific risk differences that are combined to create an overall stratified risk difference estimate. This method is tailored to the rare event setting and requires minimal data sharing. The stratified IPTW approach is then extended to the active post-market surveillance setting by incorporating group sequential monitoring boundaries using a novel permutation approach. A simulation study is conducted to evaluate the performance of the new methods relative to two centralized analysis approaches, and the methods are applied to a safety surveillance study comparing the risk of febrile seizure between two vaccines using FDA Sentinel Data from three healthcare organizations.

Indexed as

Product Surveillance, PostmarketingHumansPropensity ScoreRisk AssessmentUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationVaccinesVaccinesdistributed datagroup sequentialinverse probability of treatment weightingobservationalpost‐market surveillancevaccine safety

Identifiers

PMID41760378
PMCPMC13648869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.