ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy for Patients With Very-high Risk Localized Prostate Cancer in Clinical Stages T2 and T3a.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimThe impact of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) on biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) in patients with very-high risk localized prostate cancer remains uncertain, particularly because previous studies have included heterogeneous populations with locally advanced disease. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical significance of NCHT in patients with strictly defined T2-T3a very-high risk disease. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 49 patients treated between 2017 and 2024 were analyzed; 25 received NCHT consisting of androgen deprivation therapy and estramustine phosphate, while 24 underwent radical prostatectomy without NCHT. All patients received robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection.
resultsBaseline characteristics and pathological outcomes were comparable between the two groups, with a median follow-up period of 19 months in the NCHT group and 29 months in the non-NCHT group. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no significant difference in BRFS between the groups (
conclusionThese findings suggest that for patients with very-high risk prostate cancer limited to T2-T3a disease, NCHT does not improve biochemical recurrence outcomes, and tumor biology-particularly primary Gleason pattern 5-plays a more decisive role in prognosis than neoadjuvant systemic intensification. While cytotoxic therapy combined with androgen deprivation remains of investigational interest, its utility in organ-confined but biologically aggressive prostate cancer appears limited based on current evidence. Further large-scale, prospective studies are warranted to clarify the optimal patient selection for neoadjuvant approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.