ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2026
[Master manipulator of vascular intervention surgical robot based on haptic feedback].
Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The master manipulator is a crucial component in enabling interactive perception between the physician and the guidewire/catheter; however, the lack of real-time haptic feedback increases the difficulty of hand-eye coordination. This paper designed and developed a master manipulator for a vascular interventional surgery robot with haptic feedback to provide the physician with high-accuracy force feedback. Using a two-degree-of-freedom decoupling mechanism combining key transmission and bearings, the master manipulator captured the physician's push-pull and rotational actions accurately and synchronously. The haptic feedback module adopted dual-channel independent control: axial resistance was generated by three springs evenly distributed at 120° and driven by a linear motor, while circumferential resistance was produced directly by a brushed direct current motor. To enhance the fidelity and accuracy of force feedback, inherent friction within the mechanical structure was identified as a critical non-negligible factor. Consequently, a feedforward compensation strategy grounded in the Stribeck friction model was developed and implemented to proactively counteract friction forces. The performance of the axial force module and the circumferential torque module was evaluated, and the displacement acquisition resolutions reached 1 μm and 0.087 9°, respectively. The average error for axial force feedback was 0.11 N, and that for circumferential torque feedback was 0.154 mN·m. The master manipulator was constructed using a combination of custom 3D-printed photosensitive resin parts and machined aluminum alloy, resulting in a lightweight, low-friction structure. It provides an immersive force-interaction experience for the physician, improving operational precision and radiation safety in vascular interventional surgery and enabling coordinated "vision-hand-force perception".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.