Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41760160›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Multidomain evaluation and data-driven approaches to predict recurrent neck pain (END-RNP): a study protocol for a multicentre prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Valter Devecchi, Bernard Liew, Jonathan Price, Kym Snell, Richard Riley, Deborah Falla

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valter DevecchiCentre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Bernard LiewSchool of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Essex, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7057-7548
Jonathan PriceMusculoskeletal Physiotherapy Services, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5505-1564
Kym SnellDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9373-6591
Richard RileyDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8699-0735
Deborah FallaCentre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK d.falla@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1689-6190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeck pain (NP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and affects more than 200 million people. Incidence and associated economic burden are constantly increasing, and little is known about the factors that promote new and more severe episodes in those individuals with recurrent NP. Current evidence supports that changes in physical, psychological and social factors persist between NP episodes, and these changes might contribute to the development of new episodes. The End Recurrent Neck Pain (END-RNP) study aims to use physical, psychological and social factors tested while in symptom remission to predict, within a 12-month period, the frequency and severity of new NP episodes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The END-RNP study is a multicentre, prospective cohort study conducted from March 2025 to February 2028 at the University of Birmingham and the University of Essex (UK). 300 adults reporting two or more NP episodes in the previous year will be recruited from September 2025 to form the recurrent NP cohort, and 48 adults without a history of NP will provide normative data. Laboratory testing will be conducted for all participants when pain-free by assessing cervical kinematics and proprioception, neck-muscle strength, endurance and activation, pain processing, psychological and social factors. All recurrent NP participants will complete online questionnaires every 2 weeks for 12 months, recording days with NP, pain intensity/interference, healthcare use and other behavioural and environmental factors. Participants in the recurrent NP cohort who experience an acute NP episode during the 12-month follow-up will repeat the laboratory assessment. To develop the prediction models, candidate predictors will be the baseline measurements of any feature that shows either cross-sectional differences between recurrent NP and control groups or within-subject changes between the pain-free baseline and a pain episode. From the identified candidate predictors, two multivariable models will be developed using penalised regression, with (i) number of days with NP (linear regression) and (ii) NP severity (ordinal regression) as their respective dependent variables. Internal validation will use bootstrap resampling to estimate optimism-adjusted performance (R ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The END-RNP study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the University of Birmingham (ERN_4005-Aug2025) and by the University of Essex (ETH2526-0098) on 2 September 2025, prior to the recruitment of the first participant. The findings will be presented at national and international conferences and submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Indexed as

Neck PainAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePain MeasurementProspective StudiesRecurrenceResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomChronic PainMusculoskeletal disordersPrognosisREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID41760160
PMCPMC12959022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.