Trial reportBMJ open2026
Efficacy of bumetanide for cognitive improvement in children and adolescents with Down syndrome: study protocol of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDown syndrome (DS) is a major cause of genetically defined intellectual disability, characterised by low IQ and cognitive deficits. Among the neurobiological causes of these deficits, disruptions in gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic signalling in the hippocampus and an excitation/inhibition imbalance are thought to impair learning and memory. Evidence suggests that GABA METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The present study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a 3-month treatment with the drug bumetanide (0.02 mg/kg two times per day or placebo) on memory and psychological functioning in children and adolescents with DS. We also aim to identify possible predictors and biological and genetic markers related to treatment.The target recruitment is 64 children and adolescents with DS (aged 10-17 years). Seven visits are scheduled for each participant, during which outcome and safety measures are assessed through various clinical and instrumental investigations.Outcome measures include neuropsychological and psychological assessments, as well as biomarkers. Neuropsychological measures consist of tests evaluating cognitive level, memory and executive functions. Psychological measures include parent-reported questionnaires on psychopathological and behavioural symptoms, quality of life, sleep and adaptive functioning. Biomarkers encompass electroencephalogram (EEG) and genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic evaluations from blood and urine samples.Safety measures include physical, nephrological, cardiological and audiometric evaluations, as well as blood and urine analysis, EEG, ECG and a pregnancy test (if applicable). Neuropsychological, psychological, biomarker and safety measures are collected at baseline (visit 1 (V1)), at the end of treatment (V6) and during follow-up (V7), which is scheduled for 2 months after the end of treatment. Interim psychological and safety assessments are conducted at 1 week (V2), 2 weeks (V3), 1 month (V4) and 2 months (V5) after the start of treatment. We expect bumetanide treatment to improve visual long-term memory skills (primary outcome). Additionally, we expect improvements in total scores and subdomain scores across other visual, verbal and spatial long-term memory tasks, as well as executive functions, psychopathological measures, adaptive functioning, sleep quality and quality of life scores (secondary outcomes). Furthermore, we expect potential differences in genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic profiles between patients who respond to therapy and those who do not. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital Ethics Committee (process number 1042_OPBG_2016) and the Italian Medicines Agency. Substantial Amendment No 5 (ES5) was approved on 20 September 2023 by the Italian National Paediatric Ethics Committee and involved a revision and integration of the study protocol, now updated to version 8.1, in line with the recommendations of the Data Safety Monitoring Board.This study is being conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The present study protocol adheres to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines and was prepared using the SPIRIT 2025 Checklist. In accordance with Good Clinical Practice, written informed consent is obtained from all participants' parents or caregivers, and assent is obtained from participants when possible. The main features of the study will be presented at both international and national conferences, during scientific meetings, in presentations to families and on social media using documentation approved by competent authorities.
trial registrationThe study was prospectively registered in the EudraCT portal on 16 August 2016, prior to the enrolment of the first participant on 11 January 2023 (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2015-005780-16/IT). In accordance with Regulation (EU) 536/2014 for pharmacological interventional trials, the study was subsequently transitioned to the Clinical Trials Information System (EU CT No 2024-519342-71-00), with the initial record entered on 23 December 2024, and the transition authorised on 3 February 2025 (https://euclinicaltrials.eu/search-for-clinical-trials/?lang=en&EUCT=2024-519342-71-00). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2015-005780-16.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.