ArticleMedicine2026
Gender-based differences of post COVID-19 suicidal ideation among the university students of southern part of Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicidal ideation (SI) represents a manifestation of self-destructive thoughts and behaviors with significant public health implications. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of SI and identify associated risk factors among male and female university students in southern Bangladesh. Data were collected through simple random sampling between April and June 2022 from university students in southern Bangladesh, yielding a final sample of 584 participants (51.5% male, 48.5% female). SI was assessed as the primary outcome variable. Statistical analyses included frequency distributions, chi-square tests, and binary logistic regression to determine prevalence rates and identify associated risk factors. The prevalence of SI was substantially higher among female participants (31.4%) compared to their male counterparts (9.0%). Among female participants, significant risk factors included sleeping <7 hours per night (odds ratio (OR) = 7.670, P = .020), having a positive relationship with a partner (OR = 0.336, P = .018), experiencing mild (OR = 0.073, P < .01) or moderate depression (OR = 0.259, P = .014), and reporting no anxiety (OR = 0.031, P = .002). For male participants, significant associations were found with having no anxiety (OR = 0.014, P = .004) and experiencing moderate anxiety (OR = 0.043, P = .009). Female university students demonstrated a significantly higher risk of SI, underscoring the critical importance of gender-sensitive mental health interventions. Findings suggest that female students should be encouraged to maintain regular sleep patterns and cultivate healthy interpersonal relationships. Mental health screening and support services should be prioritized for both genders, with particular attention to depression and anxiety management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.