SynthesisMedicine2026
Antiplatelet dilemma: Clopidogrel or aspirin for long-term cardiovascular protection after dual antiplatelet therapy following PCI.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modern Era in Personalized Medicine of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Myocardial Revascularization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal choice of antiplatelet monotherapy after dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) among patients undergoing PCI remains debatable. While aspirin has long been the default choice, clopidogrel has emerged as a potential alternative due to its lower bleeding risk and possible superior ischemic protection. This meta-analysis sought to investigate the recent findings comparing the use of aspirin against clopidogrel after different durations of DAPT in patients who underwent PCI.
methodsWe searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing long-term aspirin and clopidogrel monotherapy after DAPT post-PCI. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes included major and minor bleeding, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis.
resultsSix studies comprising 14,992 patients were included. Clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE than aspirin (risk ratio [RR]: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.09-1.42; P = .001). Aspirin monotherapy resulted in a higher risk of minor bleeding (RR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.06-2.34; P = .03) and GI bleeding (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.04-1.37; P = .01). However, aspirin monotherapy was associated with a higher risk of stroke, including both ischemic (RR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.03-2.38; P = .04) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.06-3.98; P = .03).
conclusionClopidogrel monotherapy appears to be a superior alternative to aspirin for long-term secondary prevention after PCI, offering a lower risk of MACE and stroke without increasing major bleeding or mortality. However, individual factors such as genetic variability, GI bleeding risk, and cost should guide therapy selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.