ArticleMedicine2026
A unified prognostic tool for predicting critical outcomes in gastrointestinal bleeding.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common cause of emergency department admission and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Early risk stratification remains challenging, particularly before endoscopic evaluation. This study aims to develop a novel, unified pre-endoscopic scoring system to predict early clinical deterioration in both upper and lower GIB. In this retrospective study, 403 patients with GIB admitted between 2018 and 2020 were screened, of whom 390 had complete data and were included. Clinical, laboratory, and hemodynamic parameters were extracted to derive a prognostic score predicting critical deterioration within 48 hours of admission. The primary outcome included mortality within 48 hours, intensive care unit admission, transfusion of >4 units of packed red blood cells, or need for surgery. Independent predictors identified by multivariable logistic regression were incorporated into a weighted scoring system. Discriminatory performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Of 390 patients, 79 (20.3%) met criteria for critical deterioration. Independent predictors included age >70 years, male sex, a study-defined weighted comorbidity score ≥2, systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, hemoglobin < 7 g/dL, and loss of consciousness. Corresponding weighted points ranged from 2 to 4 per factor, yielding a total possible score of 0 to 17. The scoring system demonstrated excellent predictive performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.939), with high sensitivity and specificity across multiple cutoff points. The proposed scoring system is simple, rapid, and highly accurate for predicting early deterioration in GIB. It may serve as a practical tool for emergency department triage, early decision-making, and resource allocation. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to validate its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.