Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41760003›Full record

ArticleMedicine2026

A unified prognostic tool for predicting critical outcomes in gastrointestinal bleeding.

Seyyed Mahdi Zia Ziabari, Nazanin Noori Roodsari, Afshin Shafaghi, Seyyed Hassan Miri, Mohammadali Yazdanipour, Negin Letafatkar, Arman Habibi, Amirreza Aflak, Fatemeh Mohammadyari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Seyyed Mahdi Zia ZiabariDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Road Trauma Research Center, Trauma Institute, Poursina Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3708-7723
Nazanin Noori RoodsariDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Poursina Clinical Research Development Unit, Poursina Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9702-5137
Afshin ShafaghiDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, GI Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Center, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-6782-5902
Seyyed Hassan MiriDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Poursina Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID 0009-0007-5332-9407
Mohammadali YazdanipourNeuroscience Research Center, Trauma Institute, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9084-0887
Negin LetafatkarGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID 0009-0000-7980-8720
Arman HabibiGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Amirreza AflakGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID 0009-0000-5376-3931
Fatemeh MohammadyariGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8392-8194

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common cause of emergency department admission and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Early risk stratification remains challenging, particularly before endoscopic evaluation. This study aims to develop a novel, unified pre-endoscopic scoring system to predict early clinical deterioration in both upper and lower GIB. In this retrospective study, 403 patients with GIB admitted between 2018 and 2020 were screened, of whom 390 had complete data and were included. Clinical, laboratory, and hemodynamic parameters were extracted to derive a prognostic score predicting critical deterioration within 48 hours of admission. The primary outcome included mortality within 48 hours, intensive care unit admission, transfusion of >4 units of packed red blood cells, or need for surgery. Independent predictors identified by multivariable logistic regression were incorporated into a weighted scoring system. Discriminatory performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Of 390 patients, 79 (20.3%) met criteria for critical deterioration. Independent predictors included age >70 years, male sex, a study-defined weighted comorbidity score ≥2, systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, hemoglobin < 7 g/dL, and loss of consciousness. Corresponding weighted points ranged from 2 to 4 per factor, yielding a total possible score of 0 to 17. The scoring system demonstrated excellent predictive performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.939), with high sensitivity and specificity across multiple cutoff points. The proposed scoring system is simple, rapid, and highly accurate for predicting early deterioration in GIB. It may serve as a practical tool for emergency department triage, early decision-making, and resource allocation. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to validate its clinical utility.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal HemorrhageAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC Curvebleeding per rectumemergencygastrointestinal hemorrhagehematemesislower gastrointestinal bleedingmelenaprognosistriageupper gastrointestinal bleeding

Identifiers

PMID41760003
PMCPMC12956231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.