ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2026
Motion-Tracking Brillouin Microscopy for Keratoconus Suspect Identification: Comparison With Multimodal Corneal Imaging.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual Optical Elastography Techniques Reveal the Regulation of Corneal Stiffness by Collagen XIV.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the diagnostic efficacy of motion-tracking (MT) Brillouin microscopy with multimodal corneal imaging for keratoconus suspect (KCS) identification.
designProspective, cross-sectional diagnostic evaluation.
methodsThere were 56 eyes from 56 patients evaluated, including 28 eyes from 28 bilaterally normal control patients and 28 eyes from 28 keratoconus suspect patients. All patients underwent MT Brillouin microscopy using a custom-built device, Scheimpflug tomography, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST). MT Brillouin microscopy data included mean (MTB-mean) and focal minimum (MTB-min) values within the anterior plateau region. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) were calculated for variables from all modalities.
resultsNo significant demographic differences were found between groups except thinnest corneal thickness (556 μm Control vs 526 μm KCS; P < .001). MT Brillouin metrics MTB-min (AUC = 0.999, Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 96%) and MTB-mean (AUC 0.981, Sensitivity 93%, Specificity 100%) outperformed all other multimodal imaging metrics in KCS identification and group differentiation. MTB-min significantly outperformed all multimodal metrics, including the Corvis ST Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI) (AUC 0.906, P = .018), Pentacam Random Forest Index (PRFI) (AUC 0.870, P = .005), Keratoconus Index (KI) (AUC 0.873, P = .005), and Index of Height Decentration (IHD) (AUC 0.859, P = .005). The best epithelial metric, Epi 5 mm ST-IN, performed poorly in group differentiation (AUC = 0.641).
conclusionsMotion-tracking Brillouin microscopy metrics effectively identified focal corneal weakening in keratoconus suspects and significantly outperformed all multimodal imaging metrics in differentiating keratoconus suspect eyes from normal controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.