ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Comparison of two IGRA assays exploring cell-mediated immunity against CMV, BKV, and EBV in kidney transplant patients.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparative performance evaluation of the VIDAS cytomegalovirus (CMV) interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) and T-SPOT CMV for measuring CMV-specific T-cell responses in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients receiving letermovir prophylaxis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring cellular immune responses (CMIs) appears to be a new biomarker in managing immunocompromised patients, especially kidney transplant recipients. This study compared the performance of two interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)-based assays-enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay (ELISpot) and VIDAS-IGRA-for detecting T-cell responses against cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and polyomavirus BK (BKV). Twenty-eight blood samples from kidney transplant recipients were analyzed using both assays. CMV-specific CMI was assessed using overlapping peptide pools from pp65 and IE-1 proteins (JPT Peptide Technologies GmbH) and a CMV lysate (bioMérieux). All patients were monitored for opportunistic viral replication through qPCR for up to 6 months after blood sampling. For CMV-CMI, the agreement between both assays was 91.7%, 100%, and 80% after stimulation by pp65 peptide pool, pp65 + IE-1 peptide pools, and CMV lysate, respectively. Positive responses were consistent with CMV serology, especially for the VIDAS-IGRA assay and after activation by JPT's PepMix. For EBV-specific responses, positive assay agreement was 92.3%, whereas the positive agreement with BKV was 80.7%. For EBV and BKV, responses were generally weaker than those for CMV (positive response if >10 spots/250,000 PBMC for EBV and >10 spots/350,000 PBMC for BKV in ELISpot or level of IFN-γ >0.08 IU/mL in VIDAS). This study highlights the importance of standardizing interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA). While VIDAS-IGRA RUO offers an open, automated, and standardized solution, responses were in agreement with ELISpot-T assay and even more when using JPT's PepMIX. However, the cellular response to BKV is weaker, and no link with viral replication has been found. This raises the question of the value of these IGRA assays in assessing the cellular response to BKV and the need to optimize these tests. A longitudinal study to observe the evolution of the cellular response could be interesting.IMPORTANCEThis original article, a proof of concept, is the first study comparing a new interferon-gamma release assay, performed on whole blood and based on an enzyme-linked immunofluorescent assay detection technique, with a homemade enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay using activation by the same peptides. These results were also analyzed in relation to serology results. The inclusion of these tests in clinical guidelines for monitoring cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and polyomavirus BK infections requires studies to evaluate their robustness and compare them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.