ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2026
Analysis of mortality predictors in a 1-year cohort of neuropalliative care patients.
Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Palliative care has been shown to yield benefits in terms of quality of life and therapeutic planning in oncological and non-oncological diseases, but its integration in neurology remains limited.To evaluate the predictive factors of mortality in neurological patients to improve prognosis.In this 1-year cohort study, we followed patients aged > 18 years hospitalized in a neurological Semi-Intensive Care Unit in Brazil. The patients were categorized into two groups based on palliative care indication: those with and those without indication. The palliative care criteria included a "no" response to the Surprise Question, a Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) score below 70%, or significant weight loss (> 5%) with associated body changes.We included 166 patients, 87 with indication and 79 without it. The group with indication had a 29.8% mortality rate (26 deaths) and a 27.7-fold higher risk of death. The factors associated with increased mortality risk within 1 year included PPS score < 40%, answering "no" to the Surprise Question, and weight loss. Notably, 62% (n = 54) of the group with indication were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), compared to 12% (n = 12) in the group without indication. Advanced directives were only documented in 31% (n = 27) of the group with indication and in 59% (n = 16) of the patients who died. Prognostic assessment in neurological diseases is challenging due to limited data.In the present study, we found that the PPS score, the Surprise Question, and weight loss were significant predictors of mortality within 1 year. These findings highlight the need for further research to provide better end-of-life markers and ensure greater autonomy in neurological disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.