Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41758994›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026

The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the added benefit of booster doses in Hessen, Germany, during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from a vaccinated-only study.

Ivo M Foppa, Malin Trabold, Michael Frowein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ivo M FoppaAbteilung II Gesundheits- und Infektionsschutz, Hessisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Pflege, Dillenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3933-8565
Malin TraboldAbteilung für Pflege und Öffentliche Gesundheit, Hessisches Ministerium für Familie, Senioren, Sport, Gesundheit und Pflege, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Michael FroweinAbteilung II Gesundheits- und Infektionsschutz, Hessisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Pflege, Dillenburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimates of the added benefit from COVID-19 vaccine booster doses can inform seasonal vaccine recommendations. We set out to estimate COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE), avoiding common sources of bias. We chose a modified screening method, using only vaccinated cases of symptomatic COVID-19 recorded in the mandatory infectious disease reporting system, with data from a vaccination registry. Effect estimates were obtained by Bayesian logistic regression, comparing outcomes within dose strata between immunized (15-21d after vaccination) and not yet immunized (up to 7d). VE estimates were calculated recursively and relative VE estimates were obtained to quantify the added benefit of booster doses. We found VE for clinical illness to be around 90% during the predominance of the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant. During the Delta period, VE was distinctly lower, but did not decrease much further. The first booster dose added substantial protection during the Delta period, but that benefit became marginal during the Omicron period in the 18+. The effect of second booster doses, which became widespread only during the Omicron period, was modest. Using a novel, vaccinated-only study design we found that two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine offered substantial protection from symptomatic COVID-19, even during the Omicron period. One booster dose was highly effective during the Delta period, but the effect became modest during the Omicron period, when second booster doses offered, but a marginal benefit.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunization, SecondarySARS-CoV-2Vaccine EfficacyBayes TheoremGermanyHumansVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19relative vaccine effectivenessscreening methodvaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID41758994
PMCPMC12959224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.