Trial reportBlood advances2026
Phase 2 study of the lysine-specific demethylase 1 inhibitor bomedemstat for essential thrombocythemia.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04254978 (A Phase 2 Multi-Center, Open Label Study to Assess the Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacodynamics of IMG-7289 in Patients With Essential Thrombocythemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2 Multi-Center, Open Label Study to Assess the Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacodynamics of IMG-7289 in Patients With Essential Thrombocythemia
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Chinese guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of adult essential thrombocythemia (2026)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Guideline
- Molecular Response, Event-Free Survival, and Treatment-Free Remission in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Update and Review with Insights from MPN Asia 2026.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2026Review
- Inflammatory and Immune Microenvironment in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractNovel treatments that can improve outcomes of essential thrombocythemia (ET) are needed. In a phase 2 trial, participants with ET who required cytoreduction and had inadequate response to, or were intolerant of, ≥1 standard therapy received bomedemstat at a starting dose of 0.6 mg/kg per day, titrated to achieve a target platelet count (200 × 109/L to 400 × 109/L). Primary end points were safety and response, defined as a platelet count of ≤400 × 109/L without new thromboembolic events. Of 73 who received bomedemstat, at 24 weeks, 49 of 64 evaluable participants (77%) achieved a response. Durable reductions in platelet count (≤400 × 109/L for ≥12 weeks) were observed in 52 of 72 participants (72%). Durable reduction in white blood cell count (<10 × 109/L for ≥12 weeks) was observed in 61 of 72 participants (85%); of 10 participants with elevated white blood cell count at baseline, 9 had normal white blood cell count (<10 × 109/L) at week 24. Hemoglobin levels remained stable. After 24 weeks of treatment, a decrease in variant allele frequency of CALR, JAK2, or MPL was observed in 39 of 46 (85%) evaluable participants. By week 24, 2 of 73 participants (3%) had experienced ≥1 thrombotic event, and 15 of 73 (21%) experienced ≥1 hemorrhagic event. During overall treatment period, grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 34 of 73 participants (47%). AEs led to temporary treatment interruption in 29 participants (40%) and permanent discontinuation in 11 (15%). No participants died due to AEs. Bomedemstat had clinically relevant activity and manageable safety in participants with ET. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04254978.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.