Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41758929›Full record

Trial reportBlood2026

Isatuximab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma: dynamics of MRD negativity in the IMROZ study.

Robert Z Orlowski, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Xavier Leleu, Thierry Facon, Tadao Ishida, Roman Hájek, Ivan Špička, Joanna Romejko-Jarosinska, Vladimir Vorobyev, Britta Besemer and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03319667 (A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Isatuximab), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03319667 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Isatuximab (SAR650984) in Combination With Bortezomib (Velcade®), Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Not Eligible for Transplant

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2017 to 2027Enrolled475ConditionsPlasma Cell MyelomaArmsIsatuximab SAR650984, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Robert Z OrlowskiDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-5723-4129
Meletios A DimopoulosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8990-3254
Xavier LeleuService d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire and Centre d'Investigation Clinique, INSERM 1402, Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9822-4170
Thierry FaconDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital and INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche S1277, Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7705-8460
Tadao IshidaDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-3292
Roman HájekDepartment of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6955-6267
Ivan ŠpičkaCharles University and General Faculty Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Joanna Romejko-JarosinskaDepartment of Lymphoid Malignancies, Marie Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4603-1112
Vladimir VorobyevSP Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2692-8961
Britta BesemerDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Sevgi Kalayoğlu BeşışıkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9310-1278
Pawel RobakDepartment of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6078-5415
Tomas JelinekDepartment of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5467-9253
Hartmut GoldschmidtInternal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, German-speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group-Study Group, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0961-0035
Thomas MartinDepartment of Hematology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Mohamad MohtyDepartment of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7264-808X
Sandrine MacéR&D, Sanofi, Vitry-sur-Seine, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9263-6994
Ercem KodasR&D, Sanofi, Vitry-sur-Seine, France.
Christina TekleSanofi, Cambridge, MA.
Andrea T ShaferSanofi, Cambridge, MA.
Philippe MoreauDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1780-8746

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractQuadruplet therapy with Isa-VRd (isatuximab, Velcade [bortezomib], Revlimid [lenalidomide], and dexamethasone) followed by Isa-Rd in the randomized phase 3 IMROZ study provided a significant progression-free survival benefit to transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). In the primary analysis, more Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd-treated patients achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity and MRD-negative complete response (CR) at any time point than patients receiving VRd followed by Rd. Here, we report landmark analysis results of MRD negativity over time and its impact on clinical outcomes in IMROZ. Treatment with Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd led to deeper responses, with higher rates of MRD negativity and MRD-negative CR at the end of induction and during maintenance vs VRd/Rd, up to 60 months of follow-up. Benefit with Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd was observed across key patient subgroups, including older (>70 years) and frail patients. Time to progression (TTP) was significantly prolonged with Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd vs VRd/Rd in patients who converted from MRD negative to MRD positive at any time point. In a landmark analysis of the time of conversion to MRD positivity, TTP in patients who converted from MRD negative at the end of induction to MRD positive also favored Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd. Evaluating MRD status of patients at >1 time point may therefore be useful to support decisions on treatment selection and treatment continuation/discontinuation. Our findings on the degree of MRD negativity and MRD-negative CR benefit achieved during induction and maintenance by patients receiving Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd vs VRd/Rd extend the IMROZ primary analyses and further support Isa-VRd as standard of care for frontline treatment of transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03319667.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsMultiple MyelomaAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBortezomibDexamethasoneFemaleHumansLenalidomideMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBortezomibDexamethasoneisatuximabLenalidomide

Identifiers

PMID41758929
PMCPMC13277651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.