Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41758895›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Does the regulatory quality matter in the relationship between climate finance and inclusive growth in Africa?

Isubalew Daba Ayana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Isubalew Daba AyanaDepartment of Economics, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0109-1695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study scrutinizes the effect of climate finance on inclusive growth in Africa. It further explores how regulatory quality dynamics impact the connection between climate finance and Africa's inclusive growth. Grounded on panel macroeconomic data straddling 54 African states from 2013 to 2023 and employing the two-step system generalized method of moments (2SYS-GMM) econometric estimation technique, the subsequent outcomes appeared. First, climate finance encourages inclusive growth in Africa, while the interactive terms of climate finance and regulatory quality have a shrinking effect. Before interacting with the regulatory quality, a 1% in increase in climate finance heightened Africa's inclusive growth by 0.3607% in the long run, while it was accompanying with a 0.1561% upsurge in the inclusive growth in the short run, all other factors remaining constant. Contrarily, the system GMM model publicized that in the long run, a one percent increase in the interactive terms of climate finance and regulatory quality of Africa signposts to a 0.775 percent diminution in inclusive growth, while it marks a 0.753 percent lessening in the short run, on average, and other things remaining constant. The study concludes that the feeble regulatory quality of Africa is harmful in both the long run and the short run. This suggests that negative regulatory quality dynamics completely shrink the positive effect of climate finance on the inclusive growth of Africa over the periods under this study. Further, the anticipated benefits of climate finance in fostering Africa's inclusive growth may persist elusive unless noteworthy progresses are made to Africa's currently existing regulatory frameworks.

Identifiers

PMID41758895
PMCPMC12948123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.