ArticlePloS one2026
Explainable AI for gait speed analysis from multimodal data fusion.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gait speed analysis is vital for applications in healthcare, rehabilitation, human-robot interaction, and autonomous systems, necessitating robust methods to address its complexity. This study introduces an advanced framework for gait speed classification through multimodal data fusion and deep learning, optimized using Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP). Utilizing a publicly available 4 datasets of 50 injury-free adults walking at varying speeds, we integrate data from full-body motion capture, electromyography (EMG), and force plates to capture detailed gait dynamics. We propose two novel architectures: a hybrid Convolutional Neural Network with Long Short-Term Memory (CNN+LSTM) and a Multi-stream CNN, benchmarked against Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCNs), Transformer neural networks, Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) and statistical classifiers (e.g., Linear Discriminant Analysis, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Support Vector Machines). All models in this study were trained, validated and tested using three distinct strategies: experiment 1 (sample-based splitting - 10-fold cross-validation), experiment 2 (10-fold cross-validation, subject-based splitting - 5 subjects for testing), and experiment 3 (5-fold cross-validation, subject-based splitting - 10 subjects for testing). Multi-stream Quads CNN is the best-performing model, achieving the highest F1 scores across all experiments (96.6% ± 1.4% experiment 1, 96.2% ± 1.6% experiment 2, 95.9% ± 0.9% experiment 3 with top performance for all experiments 98% ± 0.6%, outperforming traditional approaches. LRP is applied to evaluate feature relevance within the model, enabling the removal of critical features to verify robustness. Comprehensive assessments, including ROC curves, confusion matrices, t-test, and perturbation analyses, validate the model's enhanced performance and durability. By combining multimodal fusion to overcome single-sensor constraints with LRP-driven feature optimization, this work provides a highly accurate and resilient tool for gait analysis, with significant potentials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.