Observational studyPloS one2026
Serum BDNF levels as a potential prognostic marker for functional recovery in stroke: Preliminary findings from a prospective observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Serum BDNF as an Objective Indicator of Rehabilitation Response in Patients with Subacute Stroke.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) crosses the blood-brain barrier and may serve as a marker of neuroplasticity. This study evaluated whether serum levels of mature BDNF, proBDNF, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) can predict functional recovery after stroke. In this prospective observational study, 93 patients with unilateral stroke and motor impairment were recruited. Clinical, and demographic data, as well as serum levels of mature BDNF, proBDNF, and MMP-9 were collected. Functional assessments measuring stroke severity, cognition, motor function, balance, and mood were conducted at three timepoints: after acute care (T0), 2 weeks post-rehabilitation (T1), and 3 months post-onset (T2). Mature BDNF significantly decreased from T0 to T2 (p = 0.003), while proBDNF remained stable. MMP-9 declined consistently across timepoints (p < 0.001). MMP-9 levels at baseline differed by BDNF genotype (p < 0.05). However, none of the biomarkers independently predicted functional recovery. Functional outcomes improved significantly over time (p < 0.001), with baseline functional scores being the strongest predictors at T1 and T2. Although these biomarkers were not independent predictors of recovery, their longitudinal trajectories may reflect underlying neurobiological recovery mechanisms during rehabilitation, although their prognostic utility remains inconclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.