ArticlePloS one2026
Association between pain, physical performance, and kinesiophobia in older women with low back pain: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unilateral Balance, Muscular Strength, Foot Arch Status, and Physical Performance in Young Adults with and Without Low Back Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Kinesiophobia and Work Disability in Fibromyalgia: Cognitive Mediation in a Population-Based Study of Women.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026Article
- Exploring the relationships between multisite musculoskeletal pain, pain characteristics, and physical function: a cross-sectional analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Use of pain neuroscience education, balance evaluation, and exercise for treating chronic pain with kinesiophobia: a narrative review with clinical recommendations.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKinesiophobia is a psychological element that may contribute to persistent pain and functional decline in older women with chronic low back pain. Clarifying its role could inform more effective rehabilitation strategies.
objectivesTo examine associations between kinesiophobia, pain intensity, and physical performance in older women with chronic low back pain.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in 2024 with 119 women aged ≥ 60 years reporting nonspecific low back pain. Kinesiophobia was assessed using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-17), and pain with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Timed Up and Go test and the 30-second sit-to-stand test were performed to evaluate balance and lower limb strength, respectively (physical performance). Correlation, regression, and mediation analyses were used to explore relationships among variables.
resultsHigher pain intensity was strongly associated with higher kinesiophobia (β = 0.74, p = 0.001), while lower limb strength showed a negative association (β = -0.17, p = 0.005). No significant relationship emerged between kinesiophobia and balance (p > 0.05). Regression indicated that pain was the strongest predictor of kinesiophobia. Mediation analyses suggested that kinesiophobia fully explained the relationship between pain and reduced lower limb strength, while strength itself partially mediated the link between pain and kinesiophobia, highlighting both direct and indirect effects.
conclusionsIn older women with chronic low back pain, kinesiophobia is positively related to pain severity and negatively related to lower limb strength, but not balance. Findings suggest fear of movement may mediate the impact of pain on physical performance, underscoring the importance of addressing psychological as well as physical factors in rehabilitation. Given the cross-sectional design, causal inferences should be drawn cautiously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.