ArticlePloS one2026
Understanding diverse subjectivities of medical students in seeking composite role models: A Q-methodology study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRole modeling, an integral part of medical education, is a complex and multifaceted process. To unravel the hidden dimensions of role model selection, a comprehensive understanding of students' subjectivities is crucial. This research aimed to elucidate the dominant subjectivities of medical students when selecting composite role models.
methodsThis study employed the Q-methodology to investigate individuals' subjectivities and portray them. Initially, we formulated Q-statements based on semi-structured interviews with students and a literature review. In the second step, 31 undergraduate medical students were selected through purposive and snowball sampling. In the next step, data were collected using a questionnaire and a Q-grid. In the fourth step, we categorized individuals using KADE software and performed factor analysis. Finally, the research team utilized factor arrays and combined quantitative and qualitative data to interpret the dominant subjectivities in the selection of composite role models.
resultsThis study identifies four dominant subjectivities among 31 undergraduate medical students, explaining 50% of total variance, including: 1) Relying on professional and skillful role models (n = 13, 34% variance): students emphasize professional behavior, responsibility, and strong teaching competence, 2) Relying on popular and famous role models (n = 4, 6% variance): students value fame at micro to macro levels, including clinical excellence and international engagement, 3) Relying on venerable and value-oriented role models (n = 6, 6% variance): students prioritize moral principles, ethical conduct, and alignment with personal values, 4) Relying on social and responsive role models (n = 5, 4% variance): students highlight social engagement, altruism, and a positive impact on society. DISCUSSION: Our research indicates that multiple factors significantly influence students' selection of composite role models, with varying subjectivities across four domains. Teachers can use these subjectivities to reflect on the factors involved in role modeling. Medical schools can leverage these identified subjectivities to enhance role modeling and improve teaching and learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.