Observational studyPloS one2026
Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissue contour changes after premolar extraction with and without alveolar ridge preservation: A prospective observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis prospective observational study evaluated three-dimensional soft tissue contour changes over a 90-day healing period following bilateral premolar extractions, with and without alveolar ridge preservation (ARP), using intraoral scanning and 3D digital analysis.
methodsEighteen orthodontic patients requiring bilateral premolar extractions were enrolled. In each patient, the extraction socket with relatively lower buccal bone height was assigned to alveolar ridge preservation (ARP), while the contralateral site was left to heal spontaneously. Intraoral scans were obtained immediately before extraction and at 30 days and 90 days post-extraction. Linear horizontal soft tissue changes were measured at 2 mm (H2) and 4 mm (H4) below the gingival margin, while vertical changes were assessed at the central aspect of the extraction socket. Surface displacement was analyzed using root mean square (RMS) distance, and volumetric changes were quantified using region-of-interest segmentation.
resultsSignificant time-dependent changes in soft tissue contours were observed (p < .001), with greater horizontal reduction at H2 than H4, and more pronounced buccal changes (p < .05). At day 90, mean horizontal reduction at H2 buccal was 1.84 ± 0.69 mm (ARP) and 1.72 ± 0.68 mm (control); corresponding H2 lingual reductions were 1.34 ± 0.89 mm and 1.16 ± 0.29 mm. Vertical reduction peaked at 30 days with partial recovery by day 90. RMS-based displacement was greater buccally. Volumetric reduction was approximately 17% in both groups. No statistically significant differences were found between groups.
conclusionsIntraoral scanning combined with digital superimposition proved effective for evaluating soft tissue changes after extraction. While ARP remains a valuable approach for alveolar bone preservation, its additional impact on soft tissue contour was limited in sites with favorable baseline conditions.
trial registrationClinical Research Information Service (CRIS), KCT0010923. Registered 19 August 2025. Retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.