ArticlePloS one2026
A data-driven analysis of spatiotemporal cues and experience accumulation effects for pitch type prediction.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional sports anticipation studies primarily rely on hypothesis-testing paradigms that target predetermined cues. However, such approaches risk overlooking unanticipated sources of predictive information. This study addresses this limitation by introducing a data-driven analysis using machine learning (ML) models as a complementary approach to conventional experimental research. Given that predictive cues embedded within movements can enhance the prediction accuracy of ML models, the proposed analysis identified spatiotemporal cues for prediction and quantified the effects of accumulating opponent-specific information across trials. Motion-capture data were collected from eight collegiate baseball pitchers, and joint-angle time series were analyzed using logistic regression models to predict pitch type (fastball vs. breaking ball). Specifically, two analyses were conducted: (1) a sliding time-window analysis to identify when and where predictive cues emerged within target motions and (2) a set-size analysis to evaluate how prediction accuracy varied with dataset size. The main results revealed that (1) predictive cues were distributed across the entire body, but models integrating whole-body information achieved the highest accuracy; (2) informative cues emerged in most body regions around the initiation of the pitcher's weight shift; (3) the accumulation of opponent-specific information had a pronounced effect up to approximately 30 pitches; and (4) substantial individual differences existed in when and which cues were effective for pitch-type prediction. These results clarify the similarities and differences between cues employed by human athletes and those utilized by ML models, thereby providing insights into athlete-specific cognitive strategies. Although alignment with human athletes must be carefully examined in future, a key theoretical contribution of this study is that it explores a complementary approach to conventional hypothesis-testing experiments by offering a time-resolved, data-driven account of where and when pitch-type-predictive information emerges in pitching kinematics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.