Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41758784›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Smartwatch-based detection of loss of pulse.

Berken Utku Demirel, Galip Utku Akay, Paul Streli, Hatice Ozturkmen, Christian Holz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Berken Utku DemirelETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9026-3693
Galip Utku AkayUniversité University of Caen Normandie, Caen, France.
Paul StreliETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Hatice OzturkmenBaskent University, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Christian HolzETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-9519

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a framework and a novel dataset for detecting loss of pulse cases using a smartwatch. Our methodology for gathering data involves inducing controlled pulse loss in the forearm within a clinical setting under medical supervision. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first multimodal dataset comprising photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals, inertial measurements (IMUs) that can be obtained from a commercially available smartwatch, and continuous recordings as ground truth, collected from 20 individuals. This dataset serves as a valuable resource for the research community to advance and verify techniques for detecting pulse loss and differentiate between the non-usage of smartwatches to prevent false alarms. Our presented framework consists of extracting several features from signals and employing machine learning models designed to differentiate between the emergency loss of pulse cases with the non-usage of smartwatches. The presented framework achieves a detection accuracy of up to 97.1%, with a false detection rate of 1.0 in an hour when evaluated using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation.

Indexed as

PhotoplethysmographyPulseAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID41758784
PMCPMC12948053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.