ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
Flexible Bayesian Inference for Identifying Significantly Correlated Multiple Pathway Sets.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a flexible Bayesian inference to identify significantly correlated high-dimensional functions with the response variable, which is challenging because the relationship between the response variable and high-dimensional functions is unknown and complex due to the dependence among high-dimensional functions. For example, in genetics pathway-based analysis, a pathway is a set of genes that serve a particular cellular or physiological function. A pathway is a high-dimensional function of genes. A pathway-based analysis can detect subtle changes in expression levels that are not detectable using a gene-based analysis. However, these pathways are not independent of each other. Because the clinical outcome is affected by multiple pathway sets, it is inappropriate to model sets using marginal analysis, such as a single-pathway analysis. Estimating set effects based on a single set ignores the fact that sets interact with each other and, thus, result in false positives or false negatives. In this paper, we propose a generalized fused kernel machine regression to test significantly correlated high-dimensional functions with the response variable, which can be either continuous or binary variables. We develop a data-driven, flexible Bayesian inference for adjusting multiple tests using the Bayes factor that accommodates dependence through a simple yet flexible structure. The benefits of our method are illustrated through a simulation study and our motivating data on genetic pathway analysis related to type II diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.