ArticleUrologia internationalis2026
Chest CT in Testicular Mass Evaluation: A Stepwise Approach to Minimize Radiation Exposure.
Article in Urologia internationalis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChest computed tomography (CT) is commonly obtained for initial staging of testicular cancer. Since pulmonary metastases are rare in the absence of retroperitoneal disease or elevated tumor markers, a selective imaging approach may be justified, as routine chest CT can lead to unnecessary radiation exposure to the thorax.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of men evaluated for a newly diagnosed testicular mass at a tertiary medical center between 2011 and 2025. According to institutional protocol, all patients underwent abdominal and chest CT prior to radical orchiectomy. A risk-stratified approach was then assessed, assuming that chest CT would have been omitted if both serum tumor markers and abdominal CT were negative for metastasis. The primary outcome was the false-negative rate for thoracic metastases among patients who would have been triaged to omit chest CT, and the key secondary outcome was the proportion of chest CT examinations that could have been avoided.
resultsAmong 183 eligible patients (mean age 34.3 ± 11.1 years), 174 (95.0%) had germ-cell tumors, including 107 (61.4%) seminomas. Chest metastases were identified in 10 patients (5.5%). Nine (90%) had positive tumor markers and seven (70%) had retroperitoneal nodal involvement. Using the prespecified rule (perform chest CT if either markers or retroperitoneal nodes were abnormal), no metastatic cases would have been missed, yielding sensitivity 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.2-100.0) and negative predictive value: 100.0% (95% CI: 95.7-100). Specificity was 48.0% (95% CI: 40.3-55.7), and application of the rule would have avoided 45.4% (95% CI: 38.0-52.9) of chest CTs.
conclusionsIntegrating serum tumor markers with abdominal CT before deciding on chest CT may safely reduce radiation exposure without compromising diagnostic accuracy in the workup of men with a testicular mass. External validation is warranted before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.