ArticleAmerican journal of nephrology2026
Tolvaptan for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Real-World Insights from a Propensity Score Weighted Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in American journal of nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTolvaptan slows disease progression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) in clinical trials, but real-world effectiveness remains uncertain. We evaluated the association between tolvaptan use and kidney function decline in a large tertiary-centre cohort.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study evaluated adults with ADPKD attending a specialist polycystic kidney disease clinic. Patients with <1 year of follow-up or <3 estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) measurements were excluded. eGFR slopes were estimated using piecewise linear mixed-effects models separating acute (<60 days) and chronic (≥60 days) phases, with the chronic slope defined as the primary outcome. Multivariable mixed-effects models and propensity score overlap weighting were used to adjust for baseline differences in covariates. Complete case analysis was performed as the primary analysis; multiple imputation was used as a sensitivity analysis. Patients receiving <6 months of tolvaptan were excluded from the primary slope analyses but retained for intention-to-treat comparisons.
resultsOf 327 patients, 119 initiated tolvaptan and 208 did not; mean duration of study follow-up was 61.4 months. Tolvaptan-treated patients had a lower baseline eGFR and trended towards a faster pre-study eGFR decline. After full adjustment, tolvaptan was associated with a modest slowing in the chronic eGFR slope of +0.45 mL/min/1.73 m2/year; however, confidence intervals (CIs) were wide (95% CI: -0.37 to +1.18) and therefore compatible with clinically meaningful benefit or no effect. Findings were directionally consistent across complete-case, overlap-weighted, and multiple-imputation analyses with similarly imprecise CIs. A total of 61 (52.1%) patients discontinued therapy within 12 months of initiation, primarily due to aquaretic side effects. In subgroup analyses, tolvaptan patients treated for ≥1 year and tolvaptan responders treated for ≥2 years showed greater magnitudes of benefit with chronic slopes of +0.58 and +0.78 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively, when compared to untreated matched cohorts.
conclusionTolvaptan was not associated with a statistically significant slowing of kidney function decline. Point estimates suggest a modest potential benefit which is attenuated when compared to controlled trials. Treatment discontinuation substantially limited treatment exposure. Further real-world evidence is required to clarify tolvaptan's true effectiveness outside controlled trial settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.