Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41758736›Full record

ReviewJournal of innate immunity2026

Neutrophil Heterogeneity after Myocardial Infarction.

Marie Piollet, Jana Grune, Clément Cochain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of innate immunity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marie PiolletUniversité Paris Cité, PARCC, INSERM, Paris, France, marie.piollet@inserm.fr.
Jana GruneDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Berlin, Germany.
Clément CochainUniversité Paris Cité, PARCC, INSERM, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular diseases (CVDs), including myocardial infarction (MI), are the leading cause of death worldwide. Neutrophils have emerged as actors in noninfectious pathologies and play major roles in CVDs: after MI, neutrophils are the first cell recruited to the ischemic heart and display multifaceted roles in orchestrating post-MI tissue healing and repair. Interestingly, recent studies described a high heterogeneity in neutrophils during this process. SUMMARY: At steady state, neutrophils present diversity during their development in hematopoietic organs and in the circulation after reaching maturity. Inflammatory environments elicit neutrophil reprogramming and further complexify neutrophil heterogeneity, especially leading to the emergence of tissue-specific populations including SiglecF+ neutrophils. Neutrophils play beneficial and deleterious roles after MI: they originate from diverse sources including the bone marrow, the spleen, and from the marginated neutrophil pool and display a time-dependent appearance of heterogeneous profile within the cardiac tissue. KEY MESSAGES: Neutrophil heterogeneity in the cardiac tissue could explain the contrasting roles ascribed to neutrophils after MI. Increased knowledge in neutrophil diversity will enable the identification of specific targets to improve cardiac healing processes.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionMyocardiumNeutrophilsAnimalsHumansInflammationWound HealingHeartInflammationIschemiaMyocardial infarctionNeutrophils

Identifiers

PMID41758736
PMCPMC13095199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.