ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Integration of learned artificial sensation with vision during freely moving navigation.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intracortical Microstimulation in Brain-Computer Interfaces: Evoking Perception and Plasticity.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans rely on both proprioceptive and visual feedback during reaching, integrating these two sensory streams to improve movement accuracy and precision. Patients using a brain-computer interface will similarly require artificial proprioceptive feedback in addition to vision to finely control a prosthesis. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) elicits sensory perceptions that could replace the lost proprioceptive signal. However, some learning may be required for encoding artificial sensation, as current technology does not give access to neurons with all of the desired encoding properties. We developed a freely moving mouse behavioral task in which to test learning and integration of artificial sensory information with natural vision. Mice implanted with a 16-channel microwire array in the primary somatosensory cortex were trained to navigate to randomly selected targets upon the floor of a custom behavioral training chamber. Target location was encoded with visual and/or patterned multichannel ICMS feedback. Mice received multimodal feedback from the beginning of training of the behavioral task, achieving 75% on multimodal trials after approximately 1,000 training trials. Mice also quickly learned to use the ICMS signal to locate invisible targets, achieving 75% proficiency on ICMS-only trials when tested. Critically, we found that performance with ICMS was as good or better than performance with natural vision, and that performance on multimodal trials significantly exceeded unimodal performance (vision or ICMS), demonstrating that animals rapidly learned to integrate natural vision with artificial sensation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.