Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41758524›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2026

Dental Coverage Through Medicaid Managed Care vs Fee-for-Service.

Hawazin W Elani, Ningsheng Zhao, Jacob Wallace, Benjamin D Sommers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hawazin W ElaniDepartment of Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ningsheng ZhaoDepartment of Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jacob WallaceSchool of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Benjamin D SommersDepartment of Health Policy and Management, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Field Experiment to Assess the Impact of Medicaid on Disparities in Dental Care UtilizationR01MD017093 · NIMHD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Hawazin W Elani · 2022 to 2026
$2.8M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD017093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Adult dental coverage under Medicaid varies widely across states and delivery systems. Most adult beneficiaries are now enrolled in managed care, yet little is known about how these benefits are structured and implemented within Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs). Objective: To examine trends in the generosity, delivery models, and enrollment patterns of adult dental benefits delivered through Medicaid MCOs and assess coverage alignment with Medicaid fee-for-service (FFS) coverage. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional analysis included adult Medicaid beneficiaries aged 19 years or older who had state Medicaid MCO or FFS coverage across all 50 states and Washington, DC. This analysis used a novel linked national dataset combining multiple Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services administrative sources from 2016 to 2022. The analysis was conducted from April 8, 2025, to October 8, 2025. Exposures: State-level Medicaid MCO or FFS program with adult comprehensive dental coverage, emergency-only dental coverage, or no dental coverage. Main Outcomes and Measures: The generosity of dental benefits; the degree of alignment in benefit generosity between Medicaid MCO and Medicaid FFS programs; and enrollment of adults in dental MCO or FFS programs by benefit (coverage) type. Results: The number of states offering comprehensive adult dental benefits through Medicaid MCOs increased from 33 (64.7%) in 2016 to 36 (70.6%) in 2022. Carve-out models, typically using stand-alone prepaid health plans for dental coverage, increased from 4 states (7.8%) in 2016 to 8 states (15.7%) in 2022. In 2016, 51.0% of states had mismatched benefit levels between MCO and FFS programs compared with 35.3% in 2022. The number of MCO enrollees with comprehensive dental coverage increased from 14.2 million (58.7%) in 2016 to 25.3 million (59.8%) in 2022, reflecting substantial managed care penetration. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that although the generosity and scope of MCO dental benefits expanded over time, alignment with FFS programs remained inconsistent. As new legislation cuts federal funding to states, understanding how dental benefits are designed and delivered is critical to inform future coverage decisions and ensure equitable access.

Indexed as

Fee-for-Service PlansInsurance CoverageInsurance, DentalManaged Care ProgramsMedicaidAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41758524
PMCPMC12949447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.