Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41758518›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Emergency Department Visits for Minor Illnesses Among Recent Refugee and Immigrant Children.

Susitha Wanigaratne, Julia Brandenberger, Hong Lu, Therese A Stukel, Tomi Odugbemi, Rick Glazier, Jen Rayner, Astrid Guttmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Susitha WanigaratneEdwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto & The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Julia BrandenbergerDivision of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Hong LuICES, Toronto, Canada.
Therese A StukelICES, Toronto, Canada.
Tomi OdugbemiICES, Toronto, Canada.
Rick GlazierICES, Toronto, Canada.
Jen RaynerICES, Toronto, Canada.
Astrid GuttmannEdwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto & The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Health care resource constraints across North America are leading to decreased access to primary care, particularly for newcomers. In Canada, several pathways to permanent residency shape early navigation to the publicly funded health care system. Objective: To explore access to primary care by analyzing the percentage of all minor illness visits seen in an emergency department (ED) in recently arrived refugee and immigrant children compared with their Ontario-born peers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study took place in Ontario, Canada, and included immigrant children who arrived between 2008 and 2017 and Ontario-born children. Participants were aged 0 to 14 years and followed up for 4 years after index date (ie, 1 year after health care eligibility). Data were analyzed between November 2023 and December 2025. Exposure: Government-assisted refugees (GARs), privately sponsored refugees (PSRs), successful asylum-seekers (referred to as protected persons [PPs] in Canada), nonrefugee immigrant (NRIs), each matched 1:4 to Ontario-born children by age, sex, and urban area. Main Outcomes and Measures: The percentage of minor illness ED visits (ie, primary care plus ED visits for equivalent reasons) in the first and second 2-year periods after eligibility was calculated for each child with at least 1 minor illness visit. The difference in mean percentage was modeled using linear regression and compared each immigrant group to Ontario-born children adjusting for morbidity, material resources quintile, and primary care affiliation. Results: Overall, 458 597 children were included (mean [SD] age, 8.0 [4.3] years; 221 237 females [48%]; 237 360 males [52%]; GARs, 10 211 [2.23%]; PSRs, 7810 [1.70%]; PPs, 11 540 [2.52%]; NRIs, 83 537 [18.22%]; Ontario-born matches, 345 499 [75.34%]). In the first 2 years, immigrant groups had significantly lower adjusted differences in the mean percentage of minor illnesses seen in the ED compared with their Ontario-born matches (GARs: -5.11% [95% CI, -5.63% to -4.57%]; PSRs: -5.24% [95% CI, -5.80% to -4.67%]; PPs: -3.37% [95% CI, -3.86% to -2.87%]; NRIs: -4.24% [95% CI, -4.40% to -4.09%]). In the second 2 years, differences were attenuated but remained significantly lower. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, refugee and nonrefugee immigrant children in their early resettlement period were less likely to use the ED than Ontario-born children for minor illnesses, suggesting adequate access to primary care.

Indexed as

Emergency Room VisitsEmergency Service, HospitalEmigrants and ImmigrantsHealth Services AccessibilityRefugeesAccess to Primary CareAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOntario

Identifiers

PMID41758518
PMCPMC12949439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.