Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41758516›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Veterans Affairs Clinical Resource Hubs and Rates of Mental Health Community Care Referrals.

Samantha L Connolly, Erin L Jaske, Chelle Wheat, Lawrence J Wahlberg, Karin Nelson, Idamay Curtis, Bradford Felker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samantha L ConnollyCenter for Health Optimization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts.
Erin L JaskePrimary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Chelle WheatPrimary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Lawrence J WahlbergNational Clinical Resource Hub, VA Central Office, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.
Karin NelsonCenter for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Idamay CurtisPrimary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Bradford FelkerPrimary Care Analytics Team, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

HSRD VA IK2 HX003427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In an effort to increase access to care, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has created 2 additional pathways for veterans to receive mental health (MH) services: regional VA Clinical Resource Hubs (CRHs) and VA-purchased community care (CC). Previous studies have found that veterans rate their satisfaction with VA MH care, including via CRHs, higher than CC. It is unclear whether increased CRH use decreases referrals to CC. Objective: To determine whether clinics with higher CRH utilization have fewer CC referrals or, alternatively, whether clinics with local care shortages rely on both CRH and CC at similar levels to ensure adequate access to MH care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This longitudinal cohort study included all veterans with at least 1 outpatient MH encounter between 2018 and 2019 in 1149 MH clinics within the VA. The study evaluated changes in CC referral rates at clinics with and without CRH visits between baseline and post-CRH implementation (October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2023). In addition, CC referral rates at clinics with higher use of CRH were compared with clinics with lower CRH utilization. Data were analyzed from August 20, 2024, to July 25, 2025. Exposures: Clinics were classified based on whether they had any CRH utilization, as well as whether their per-patient rate of CRH visits fell in the top 25% (high penetration) or bottom 25% (low penetration). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the number of CC referrals per 1000 patients. Difference-in-differences (DID) analyses were used. Results: The sample included 1 120 250 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.04 [15.38] years; 15.99% female). Clinics with any CRH utilization showed a slight but statistically significant increase in CC referrals in the post-CRH implementation period compared with clinics with no CRH utilization (DID, 0.525; 95% CI, 0.181-0.868; P = .003). However, clinics with high penetration of CRH had fewer CC referrals per month compared with low-penetration clinics at the end of the CRH implementation period (DID, -20.00 referrals; 95% CI, -21.90 to -18.20; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of VA MH clinics, successful CRH implementation was associated with fewer CC referrals, suggesting that clinics with higher CRH utilization were less reliant on VA-purchased CC. Results underscore the importance of developing strong CRH infrastructures to ensure veteran access to high-quality MH care.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesReferral and ConsultationVeteransAgedFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID41758516
PMCPMC12949438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.