Trial reportJAMA network open2026
Initial Vancomycin Taper for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04138706 (Initial Vancomycin Taper for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Initial Vancomycin Taper for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiome-based therapeutics forGut microbes · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- ADVANCE-ID bacterial and fungal infections review: antimicrobial resistance research updates: Summary of clinical trials and implementation studies, March-April 2026.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, and recurrent CDI (rCDI) is common. Objective: To determine whether a 4-week vancomycin pulse and taper regimen would be superior to a standard 2-week vancomycin pulse regimen in terms of recurrence. Design, Setting, and Participants: This parallel-design, double-blind clinical trial was performed at 12 Canadian hospitals. Adults with a first episode or first recurrence of CDI were eligible to participate. Patients needed to have clinical CDI with laboratory confirmation and to have improved by day 10 of treatment. Recruitment began November 19, 2020, and all follow-up was completed by October 4, 2024. Intervention: All patients received a 2-week pulse of vancomycin (standardized at 125 mg orally 4 times a day at the time of recruitment) and were then randomized to receive either vancomycin taper (125 mg orally twice a day for 7 days and then 125 mg once a day for 7 days) or an equivalent schedule of placebo capsules. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the posterior probability of superiority of the vancomycin pulse and taper regimen to prevent rCDI at day 56. A secondary outcome was recurrence at day 38. Binary outcomes were analyzed using a bayesian generalized linear model with minimally informative priors yielding log relative risk (RR) with 95% bayesian credible intervals (CrIs). Results: The trial was stopped early due to feasibility of recruitment. Among 265 participants (135 in the intervention group and 130 in the control group; median age, 63 [IQR 47-74] years; 138 [52.1%] women), recurrence at day 56 occurred in 20 of 135 patients (14.8%) in the vancomycin pulse and taper group compared with 23 of 130 (17.7%) in the vancomycin pulse group (adjusted RR, 0.84 [95% CrI, 0.48-1.45]; posterior probability of superiority, 73.8%). Recurrence at day 38 occurred in 9 of 135 patients (6.7%) in the vancomycin pulse and taper group compared with 20 of 130 (15.4%) in the vancomycin pulse group (adjusted RR, 0.43 [95% CrI, 0.19-0.89]; posterior probability of superiority, 99.0%). Adverse effects were rare in both groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, a 4-week vancomycin pulse and taper regimen had a probability of 73.8% to be superior to a 2-week pulse regimen. This approach may represent a safe and accessible treatment option to delay or prevent early CDI recurrence. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04138706.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.