ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2026
Non-invasive ventilation treatment and craniofacial growth in children: A scoping review.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo summarize current evidence and identify knowledge gaps regarding the craniofacial consequences of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) treatment in children.
methodsAn electronic search was performed in six databases according to PCC strategy. Studies that evaluated children as Population (P), craniofacial growth as Concept (C) and NIV treatment as Context (C) met the eligibility criteria. The citations were exported to a reference manager and screened. The data was extracted by two reviewers, and the synthesis of results was presented in a narrative way.
resultsA total of 7,476 references were identified. Eight studies met the eligibility criteria and were included. The most common NIV interface was the nasal mask, and the Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) was the most used type. The impact on maxillary growth was observed as negative in five studies, and not significant for the other two studies. The impact on mandibular growth was negative in one study and positive in another. The growth impact was also negative for the frontal bone and tooth position, while a non-significant impact was observed for facial convexity.
conclusionsNIV can be associated with dimensional changes in midface such as maxillary shortening and hypoplasia. However, NIV interfaces, pressure levels, and the association with comorbidities should be analyzed in future longitudinal standardized studies to understand their real impact, focusing on long-term assessment of craniofacial features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41758419What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.