ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Biomechanical aspects in the treatment of periprosthetic humeral fractures].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periprosthetic humeral fractures represent a relevant complication of shoulder arthroplasty and the incidence of 0.5-3% is expected to increase given current demographic trends. Biomechanical aspects are considered in therapeutic decision-making and planning, including fracture location and morphology as well as patient-specific factors. These include among others osteoporosis and age, but also other comorbidities of the patient, such as nicotine abuse or obesity. The fracture classification follows the internationally recognized system developed by Sanchez-Sotelo und Athwal. Conservative treatment is recommended for nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures without loosening of the prosthesis. Displaced fractures with sufficient bone stock and no loosening of the prosthesis can be treated with plate osteosynthesis. In the case of loosening of the humeral component and displaced fractures with inadequate bone stock for stable fixation using plate osteosynthesis, revision arthroplasty is indicated. In revision arthroplasty, bone defects of the proximal humerus increase the bending forces and result in a substantial torsional load on the distal anchorage of the prosthesis shaft. Hence, for bone defects exceeding 5-6 cm, the additional use of an allograft has shown biomechanical superiority, however, this procedure should be reserved for specialists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41758400What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.